Mini assignments Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Mini assignments - Coursework ExampleHowever, the exposit are not accurate. This makes the disputation valid, but not sound. A valid deductive air that is sound put in Either I consume a chase or a cat. presumption I do not own a cat. completion Therefore, I must own a dog. This argument can be valid and sound. It is possible that I own a cat or a dog, but not both. It is possible I own a dog. It also cannot be true that I own a cat because of one of the premises. The only windup is I own a dog. 2. Inductive Language Construct an inductive argument for a particular proposition conclusion. Then, explain what you might do to make this inductive argument stronger, either by revising the premises or by revising the conclusion. Inductive argument for a specific conclusion Premise conjuring trick is a redhead. Premise Jay is a redhead. Premise Jennifer is a redhead. Premise John, Jay, and Jennifer are siblings. Premise John, Jay, and Jennifers parents are redheads. Conclusion Pa rents with red hair have a good chance of having children with red hair. This is an inductive argument because the conclusion is more than likely correct. However, it is not as strong as it could be. Here is another argument that might be stronger. Premise John is a redhead. Premise Jay is a redhead. Premise Jennifer is a redhead. Premise John, Jay, and Jennifer are siblings. Premise John, Jay, and Jennifers parents are redheads. ... Give an explanation of why each makes a geological fault in drawing the conclusion it does. Review your classmates examples and see if they, in fact, commit the fallacy identified. Ad Hominem false belief Premise Adolf Hitler was German Premise Adolf Hitler waged a genocide war against the Jews, mentally ill, and Slavic people. Premise Hitler was evil. Conclusion Therefore all Germans are evil. This is an Ad Hominem Fallacy because it is based on a persons, Hitler, character. implore the headway Premise Adultery is always wrong. Premise Jane has comm itted adultery. Conclusion Therefore, Jane is always wrong. This is Begging the Question Fallacy because it has circular reasoning. Jane is wrong because she committed adultery. Adultery is wrong, so Jane is wrong for committing it. Hasty Generalization Premise My computer is an genus Acer. Premise My computers hard drive crashed because of a virus. Conclusion All Acer computers have hard drives that crash. This is a Hasty Generalization. Just because my computer crashed due to a virus does not mean all Acer computers have hard drives that crash. I might not have had the secure anti-virus protection on my computer, or I could have bought a damaged computer. Just because one convergence fails does not mean the whole line of products impart fail. 4. The Media and Fallacies One rich source of fallacies is the media television, radio, magazines, and the Internet (including, of course, commercials.) nominate two distinct fallacies you see committed in the media. Do you think it is mo re likely that you will not be fooled by these fallacies having studied logic? What do you think those