Law - Law of Tort Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Law - Law of Tort - Essay ExampleThe law is also concerned with the plectron of transferring blame. This implies that using the law blames place be transferred to another person or party. Tort law consequently provides remedies to an idiosyncratic or a party for losses suffered due unreasonable actions of another person or party. There are two categories of tort laws and they are concerned with suits that are aimed at protecting an individuals privacy against any violation. Negligence and intentional are the two basic categories or torts and they hold still for the main tort claims made in most civil courts (Yeats, Giliker & Luckham, 2005). From the given scenario, Charles a freelance photographer sneaks into Bertram fuse without his knowledge and proceed to takes his nude person photograph. Charles was able to gain access to the highly restricted compound through Desdemonas assistance. Later a market researcher named Alex tries to beat an interview with Bertram in his prei ndication without his content. Bertram denies him a chance for an interview based on the warning bell ringer at his propose. In particular, the character states that any trespasser will be prosecuted. Bertram go ahead and caries the market researcher to the drive although he had proved his identity. According occupiers liability act of 1984, Alex Charles and Desdemona, violated Bertrams undecomposed to privacy on the other hand Bertram violated Alexs rights by carrying him forcefully. ... Firstly, Bertram is a billionaire who believes that he should have a private life free from any intruder. He has gone to an extent of placing a sign at his drive indicating that all trespassers will be prosecuted. As an ordinary person, Bertram is entitled to privacy agree to the law and therefore any trespassing is a violation of his rights (Yeats, Giliker, Luckham, 2005). Secondly, his house is a private place and therefore he has the right to allow accept or reject visitors accordingly. Co ncerning the two unauthorized visitors to Bertrams compound, Charles has a more serious case to answer according to tort law. Although he is a journalist, he needed endorsement before gaining access to Bertrams compound. In addition, Charles took unauthorized photographs in two divorce occasions and this proves that his acts were intentional. Charles not only intentionally took unauthorized photograph of Bertram and his compound but he took nude photographs of the complainant. These activities are intentional and therefore Bertram has legal claims according to the tort law. Basing on those arguments Bertram can proceed to come a legal suit against the trespassers however, he should make his claims with caution in order to attract the applicable remedies. He has to be aware of the possible claims that Charles can present in the courtroom in defence force of his action. Charles can base his counterclaims on the requirements of his career as a journalist. From this basis, Charles c an claim that as a journalist, his work serves the public and therefore he needs to cover events that are of public interest. He can therefore claim that the highly restricted Bertrams compound is of public interest and therefore he should have some legal protections against any legal suit that